• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

OutdoorEager

  • HOME
  • GUIDES
  • GEAR
  • CONTACT

stoves

Soto Windmaster vs Pocket Rocket Deluxe

May 2, 2020 by Ricky 3 Comments

Soto Windmaster (see image) is the superior one for almost every feature except the compactness, it boils faster, weighs less, uses less fuel, offers better pot stabilization, makes less noise, works slightly better in windy conditions.

Soto Windmaster vs Pocket Rocket Deluxe, they are both great backpacking stoves that have several differences.

After extensive research of both stoves, I have created this article to help you pick the most suitable stove for you.

In summary, Soto Windmaster is the superior one for almost every feature except the compactness, it boils faster, weighs less, uses less fuel, offers better pot stabilization, makes less noise, works slightly better in windy conditions.

On the other hand, due to its foldable pot supports MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe is more compact and packs down smaller.

Windmaster vs Pocket Rocket Deluxe: Main Differences


SOTO WINDMASTER

MSR POCKET ROCKET DELUXE


Stove Weight

2.3 oz w/TRIFLEX
3.1 oz w/4FLEX

2.9 oz

Ignitor

YES

YES

Boil time (700 ml)

3 min 20 seconds

3 min 39 seconds

Fuel Consumption

(700 ml)

12.9 grams

16.7 grams

Distance Between Pot and Burner Head

7 mm

10 mm

Package type

Cloth Sack

Cloth Sack

Prices

Check Price on REI

Check Price on REI

Detailed Overview of MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe vs Soto Windmaster

Pot Support

Their biggest difference is the Pot Support, Soto Windmaster comes with two different pot supports so you can use the proper one depending on your trip.

Its pot supports are called TRIFLEX and 4FLEX. TRIFLEX can be used for ultralight backpacking and but it has a smaller diameter, 4FLEX can be used for more luxurious trips, it’s heavier but has a bigger diameter, therefore, offers a better pot stabilization. But MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe‘s pot support is attached to the stove.

With Soto Windmaster you can use 4FLEX and have a better Pot Stabilization or you can use TRIFLEX and have a lighter backpack, Due to this versatility, Soto Windmaster is the superior one when it comes to Pot Support.

Here is a picture that I’ve created to demonstrate the pot support diameters:

Ignition

Both stoves come with an integrated piezo igniter that is hidden within the center tube of the stove to save space and be more compact.

Compactness & Packed Dimension

Compactness & Packed Dimension are the only two things where MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe is better than Soto Windmaster.

Due to its foldable design Pocket Rocket Deluxe is more compact and packs down smaller than Soto Windmaster.

Weight

Weight is the most important factor for ultralight backpacking enthusiasts. As I’ve mentioned before, Soto Windmaster comes with 2 different pot stands, for ultralight backpacking you can use TRIFLEX pot support, when TRIFLEX is assembled Soto Windmaster weighs 2.3 oz, when 4FLEX is assembled it weighs 3.1 oz. MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe, on the other hand, weighs 2.9 oz.

Sound

It might not be the first priority when buying a backpacking stove, for those who seek a quiet stove, Stove Windmaster is much quieter than MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe, it is probably the quietest stove that I have come across with.

Boiling Time

MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe (see image) is the better option only for compactness, due to its foldable design it’s more compact and packs down smaller.

When tested with 700 ml of water, MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe boiled this amount of water in 3 min 39 seconds, on the other hand, Soto Windmaster boiled the same amount in 3 minutes 20 seconds.

The difference is not so big, both boil water in much less time than the other alternatives on the market, but still, Soto Windmaster is the superior one when it comes to boiling time.

Fuel Consumption

MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe used 16.7 grams for boiling 700 ml of water, while Soto Windmaster used 12.9 grams for boiling the same amount.

Soto Windmaster is %29 more efficient than MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe for fuel consumption.

Wind Protection

Both of the stoves have a design of raised ledge at the crown of the burner head which acts as a windscreen. But to be fair, Soto was the first brand that brought this design into the market, MSR copied it afterward (with Pocket Rocket Deluxe).

Another important factor that most backpackers miss is how close is the pot sits to the flame. The closer the pot sits to the flame, the better the wind protection, and the more the efficiency.

With Soto Windmaster, the pot sits closer to the flame, the gap is only 7mm. With Pocket Rocket Deluxe, on the other hand, the gap is 10mm.

To sum it up, they both do the job well, but Soto Windmaster (as it can be understood from its name) performs better in windy conditions.

Heat Level Adjustability

Both stoves have micro regulators, they both offer great simmering control. So Adjustability-wise, one is not better than the other.

Conclusion: Soto Windmaster vs Pocket Rocket Deluxe

There are 9 factors to consider when buying a backpacking stove.

Soto Windmaster is the superior one when it comes to:

  • Pot Support, it offers the versatility of using 2 different pot stands
  • Weight, when lighter pot stand is assembled to the stove, it weighs 2.3 oz (which is 0.6 oz lighter compared to MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe)
  • Sound, Soto Windmaster is much quieter than MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe
  • Boiling time, it boils water faster than Pocket Rocket Deluxe
  • Fuel Consumption, when tested for boiling 700 ml of water in the same conditions Windmaster used %29 less fuel than Pocket Rocket Deluxe
  • Wind Protection, although they both do the job Soto Windmaster performs better in windy conditions

MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe is the better option only for:

  • Compactness, due to its foldable design it’s more compact and packs down smaller

One is not better than the other for:

  • Ignition, they both have an igniter to start the fire
  • Heat Level Adjustability, they both offer great simmering control

To sum it up, Soto Windmaster is the better option for almost every feature, but if you want the one that packs down the smallest no matter what, then go with MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe.

Check out the latest prices of:

Soto Windmaster
MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe

If you are not satisfied with both of the stoves, you can check out my article where I compared Jetboil MightyMo to MSR Pocket Rocket 2.

Filed Under: GEAR Tagged With: comparison, stoves

Soto Amicus vs Pocket Rocket 2

April 29, 2020 by Ricky Leave a Comment

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 (see image) offers a better pot support design, better pot stabilization, more wind protection, and it is more durable.

MSR is one of the biggest brands on the outdoor market, on the other hand, Soto is not as famous as MSR but it’s well known for its quality stoves.

In this article, I will focus on one of the finest models of both; Soto Amicus vs Pocket Rocket 2.

In summary, they both weigh 2.6 oz, but Soto Amicus boils faster, packs down smaller, uses less fuel, and comes with an ignition (optional) while MSR Pocket Rocket 2 offers a better pot support design, better pot stabilization, more wind protection, and it is more durable.

Specs: Amicus vs Pocket Rocket 2


SOTO AMICUS

MSR POCKET ROCKET 2


Stove Weight

2.6 oz (without the ignitor)
2.9 oz (with the ignitor)

2.6 oz

Packed Weight

2.8 oz (without the ignitor)
3.1 oz (with the ignitor)

3.7 oz

Ignitor

Optional

No

Boil time

(1 liter)

5 minutes

3.5 minutes

Collapsed Dimensions

1.4"×1.8"×0.5"

2"x2"x3"

Water Boiled

1 oz fuel

2 liters

2 liters

Package type

Cloth Sack

Rigid Carry-Case

Check Prices

Check Price on REI

Check Price on REI

Soto Amicus vs Pocket Rocket 2 Detailed Overview

Pot Support

Both Amicus and Pocket Rocket 2‘s pot support is foldable and attached to the body of the stove.

The big difference is Amicus’ pot support has a smaller diameter, therefore, it’s harder to stabilize big pots and pans.

On the other hand, due to its bigger pot support design, with MSR Pocket Rocket 2 you can use both big pots and small pots without the concern of sliding off the stove.

Ignition

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 doesn’t feature an ignition, on the other hand, Soto Amicus offers the optionality to purchase the stove with or without an ignition.

When compared to other brands’ stoves, Soto has a really innovative ignitor design, its ignitor is hidden within the center tube of the stove to save space.

Compactness & Packed Dimension

Both of the stoves have a foldable design and they’re both highly compact, but Soto Amicus packs down much smaller than MSR Pocket Rocket 2.

If you’re a numbers guy, MSR Pocket Rocket 2 collapses to 2″ x 2″ x 3″ while Soto Amicus collapses to 1.4″×1.8″×0.5″

Also, MSR Pocket Rocket 2 comes with a rigid carry case which has enough space to store a fire starter such as a match or a lighter.

Weight

Weight is the most important factor when it comes to backpacking, but luckily, both of the stoves equally weigh 2.6 oz. Soto Amicus weighs 2.9 oz with the ignitor though. If you want the luxury of having an ignitor it will add up 0.3 oz to your load.

Even though they weigh the same, coming with a rigid carry case adds an extra 1.1 oz of weight (when packed) to Pocket Rocket 2, which makes it heavier but more durable than Soto Amicus.


Stove Weight

Packed Weight

Soto Amicus (w/o ignitor)

2.6 oz

2.8 oz

Soto Amicus (with ignitor)

2.9 oz

3.1 oz

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 (w/o ignitor)

2.6 oz

3.7 oz

Boiling Time

Amicus is the superior one when it comes to boiling times.

Soto Amicus (see image) can be purchased as a kit with a 1L pot and a lid. The Kit weighs 4.16 oz and packs down to 4.7″ x 4.7″ x 3.8″.

When tested with 700 ml of water, Soto Amicus boiled this amount in 3 min 16 sec, on the other hand, MSR Pocket Rocket 2 boiled the same amount in 3 min 31 seconds.

If you want an even better boiling time and pot support Soto Windmaster can boil the same amount in 2 min 49 seconds and, offers the 2 different pot supports. You can also check out the article where I compare Soto Windmaster to Soto Amicus.

Fuel Consumption

For boiling 700 ml of water, Pocket Rocket 2 used 12 grams of fuel, on the other hand, Soto Amicus used only 9 grams of fuel.

Therefore, Soto Amicus is %30 more efficient than Pocket Rocket 2 when it comes to Fuel Consumption.

Wind Protection

For decreasing the wind effect and allowing better simmering control:

  • MSR Pocket Rocket 2 features a windclip which is placed on the burner head
  • Soto Amicus is designed with a raised ledge at the crown of the burner head and a concave burner surface

Therefore, they both do the job when it comes to wind protection, but for the sake of comparison, I can say that MSR Pocket Rocket 2 is slightly better.

Heat Level Adjustability

They both perform well in adjusting the heat, and both offer great simmering control.

Kits

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 can be purchased as MSR Pocket Rocket 2 Mini Stove Kit which includes a 0.75L pot, a bowl, and a lid with straining holes. The kit weighs 9.9 oz and packs down to 4″ x 4″ x 5″. Check out the latest price of the MSR Pocket Rocket 2 Mini Stove Kit.

Soto Amicus can be purchased as a kit with a 1L pot and a lid. The Kit weighs 4.16 oz and packs down to 4.7″ x 4.7″ x 3.8″. Check out the latest price of Soto Amicus Kit.

Conclusion: Soto Amicus or Pocket Rocket 2

Soto Amicus is the better option when it comes to:

  • Ignition, it offers the optionality of purchasing with or without ignition, while Pocket Rocket 2 doesn’t feature an ignition
  • Packed Dimension, it packs down much smaller than Pocket Rocket 2
  • Boiling Time, it boils water faster (it boiled 700ml of water 15 seconds earlier than Pocket Rocket 2)
  • Fuel Consumption, Amicus is more efficient, it boils 700 ml of water with 9gr fuel while Pocket Rocket 2 used 12 gr fuel for boiling the same amount of water

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 is the superior one for:

  • Pot Support, Pocket Rocket 2’s bigger Pot Supports offers better pot stabilization
  • Wind Protection, Although both perform well in windy conditions, Pocket Rocket 2 is slightly better
  • Durability, Pocket Rocket 2 comes with a hard-case to increase damage protection.

Check out the latest prices of:

Soto Amicus
MSR Pocket Rocket 2

Filed Under: GEAR Tagged With: comparison, stoves

Soto Windmaster vs Amicus

April 28, 2020 by Ricky Leave a Comment

Soto Windmaster (see image) is the superior one for almost every factor, it’s more versatile, offers better pot support and pot stabilization, lighter when assembled with its TRIFLEX pot support, less noisy, and has a bigger burner head which allows heat to reach a bigger space underneath the pot.

Choosing the right backpacking stove can be overwhelming especially with so many alternatives on the market.

But if you landed on this page I’m assuming you are thinking of buying a Soto Stove. So in this article, I will focus on Soto Windmaster vs Amicus and compare them by every aspect you need to look for when purchasing a backpacking stove.

In summary, Soto Windmaster is the superior one for almost every factor, it’s more versatile, offers better pot support and pot stabilization, lighter when assembled with its TRIFLEX pot support, less noisy, and has a bigger burner head which allows heat to reach a bigger space underneath the pot. On the other hand, Soto Amicus is more pocket-friendly, more compact, and packs down smaller.

Soto Windmaster vs Amicus: Specifications


SOTO WINDMASTER

SOTO AMICUS


Stove Weight

2.3 oz w/TRIFLEX
3.1 oz w/4FLEX

2.6 oz w/o Ignitor
2.9 oz w/ Ignitor

Ignitor

Yes

Optional

Boil time (700 ml)

2 min 50 seconds

3 min 16 seconds

Output

2,800 kcal / h or

3,260 W or 11,000 BTU

2,800 kcal / h or

3,260 W or 11,000 BTU

Package type

Cloth Sack

Cloth Sack

(More Robust)

Burn Time

Approx. 1.5 hours with 250 g (8 oz) canister.

Approx. 1.5 hours with 250 g (8 oz) canister.

Check Prices

Check Price on REI

Check Price on REI

Feature Comparison of Windmaster & Amicus

Pot Support & Head Size

The most important differences between Soto Windmaster and Amicus are their Pot Supports & Head Sizes.

Soto Windmaster’s pot support is not attached to the stove, it’s assembled separately, and it comes with two different pot supports; TRIFLEX and 4FLEX which allows you the versatility of choosing suitable pot support depending on your trip.

On the other hand, pot support of Soto Amicus is attached to the stove.

Windmaster features a bigger burner head, therefore, heat reaches a bigger space underneath the pot, this doesn’t make any difference while boiling water, but if you are planning to make a meal with a pan at a light simmer, Windmaster would perform better.

Boiling Time

Windmaster is the superior one when it comes to boiling times. When tested with 700 ml of water, Soto Amicus boiled this amount in 3 min 16 sec, on the other hand, Soto Windmaster boiled the same amount in 2 min 49 seconds,

Sound

Generally, the sound is not one of the top priorities, but if it’s important to you. Windmaster makes less sound compared to Amicus.

Weight

At first, Windmaster seems heavier since it is bigger, BUT when TRIFLEX pot support is attached Windmaster weighs 0.6 oz less than Amicus.

Soto Windmaster weighs 2.3 oz with TRIFLEX pot support and 3.1 oz with 4FLEX pot support, while Soto Amicus weighs 2.9 oz.

Fuel Consumption

They are equal when it comes to Fuel Consumption. Both stoves can burn 1.5 hours with 250 g (8 oz) canister.

Packed Dimension

As I’ve already mentioned, pot support of Amicus is attached to the stove. With its foldable design, Soto Amicus packs down smaller than Soto Windmaster.

Stove

Dimensions

Soto Windmaster (Pot Support isn’t attached to the stove)

47x50x88 mm / 1.9×2.0x3.5 in.

Soto Amicus (Pot Support is attached to the stove)

34x46x64 mm / 1.4×1.8×0.5 in

Triflex Pot Support of Windmaster

94 x 10 x 33 mm / 3.7 x 0.4 x 1.0 in.

4Flex Pot Support of Windmaster

47 x 77 x44 mm / 1.9×3.0x1.7 in

Soto Amicus (see image) uses Triple O ring Seal type of regulator.

Windmaster‘s pot support is not attached to the stove, which actually is even better since it offers you the versatility of choosing the suitable pot support depending on your trip.

Some might think that carrying demountable gear is a con, but I believe they’re even better, they offer you the ability to nest each part separately if needed, which leads to having a more compact backpack.

Last but not least, although the difference is not big, for the sake of comparison I should include that, Soto Amicus comes with a more robust carrying bag.

Heat Level Adjustability

Soto Amicus uses Triple O ring Seal type of regulator, on the other hand, Soto Windmaster uses a Micro Regulator. They both offer great simmering control, but the Soto Windmaster’s Regulator handle is much easier to turn.

Ignition

Soto Amicus offers two options; you can purchase it with or without a firestarter, BUT it isn’t optional for Soto Windmaster it comes with a fire starter.

When compared to other brands’ stoves, Soto has a really innovative ignitor design, its ignitor is hidden within the center tube of the stove to save space, therefore, I would recommend going with the model that features ignitor.

Wind Protection

Both Amicus and Windmaster have a concave-shaped burner design that practically performs as a windscreen, allows you to heat the water at a light simmer even in windy conditions.

But Windmaster’s burner is much closer to the pot, which makes it more efficient in windy weather.

Conclusion: Soto Windmaster or Amicus

Soto Windmaster is the better option when it comes to:

  • Pot Support, it offers the versatility of using 2 different pot supports
  • Simmering, it has a bigger torch which reaches a bigger space underneath the pot compared to Soto Amicus
  • Weight, when TRIFLEX pot support is assembled it’s 0.6 oz lighter than Amicus
  • Sound, it’s much quieter than Soto Amicus
  • Boiling Time, it boils water faster than Soto Amicus
  • Regulator, although they both offer great simmering control, Soto Windmaster’s regulator is easier to use

Soto Amicus is the superior model for:

  • Compactness, it’s more compact with its foldable design
  • Durability, it comes with a sturdier pack for extra protection
    The optionality of Ignition, Amicus has two models so you can buy it with or without a fire starter

Check out the latest prices of:

Soto Windmaster
Soto Amicus



If you’re not sure with either of the stoves, check out my article about Jetboil MightyMo and MSR Pocket Rocket for alternatives.

Important: Backpacking stoves don’t come with a canister, you should purchase it separately.

Check out the latest prices of Jetboil Jetpower Fuel and MSR Isopro Canister Fuel.

Filed Under: GEAR Tagged With: comparison, stoves

Jetboil MightyMo vs Pocket Rocket

April 26, 2020 by Ricky Leave a Comment

The most important feature of Pocket Rocket 2 (see image) is its wind protector design, it has a 3-direction wind clip to offer protection from the wind.

Having the handiest and the most convenient gear is essential when backpacking, carrying a stove can be a big burden if it isn’t selected properly.

Jetboil MightyMo and MSR Pocket Rocket 2 are the most compact and efficient backpacking stoves on the market, one is not better than the other, each one is superior in different functions, therefore, I will help you pick the most suitable one for you. 

Firstly, I should mention that MSR Pocket Rocket 2 is the new and improved version of the old MSR Pocket Rocket, therefore this comparison will focus on Jetboil MightyMo vs Pocket Rocket 2.

In summary, MightyMo boils quicker, uses less fuel to boil the same liter of water, offers better heat adjustability, features an ignitor and comes with fuel stabilizers.

On the other hand, Pocket Rocket 2 is lighter, features wind clips for wind protection, offers better pot support and comes with a rigid case.

Specs: Jetboil MightyMo vs MSR Pocket Rocket 2


JETBOIL MIGHTYMO

MSR POCKET ROCKET 2


Stove Weight

3.3 oz

2.6 oz

Packed Weight

3.7 oz w/o fuel stabilizer
4.7 oz with fuel stabilizer

3.7 oz

Ignitor

Yes

No

Boil time (1 liter)

3 minutes

3.5 minutes

Water Boiled 1 oz fuel

3.4 liters

2 liters

Package type

Cloth Sack

Rigid Carry-Case

Fuel Stabilizer

Yes

No

Check Prices

Check Price on REI

Check Price on REI

JetBoil MightyMo Review

MightyMo (see image) boils quicker, uses less fuel to boil the same liter of water, offers better heat adjustability, features an ignitor and comes with fuel stabilizers.

Jetboil MightyMo is the best friend of ultralight gear lovers. Not only it’s one of the lightest backpacking stoves on the market but it’s also the only stove that features a fire starter (compared to other ultralight stoves).

There are some complaints about fire starters going bad after a while, but even when it’s broken you can still ignite the stove with a match or lighter like any other stove on the market.

It features a “4 full-turn” regulator to adjust the heat and gives you great simmering control.

MightyMo boils water in less than 3 minutes.

Another plus of Jetboil MightyMo is; it comes with fuel stabilizers to use it even on uneven surfaces.

Check the latest price of Jetboil MightyMo.

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 Review

Pocket Rocket 2 is the lightest stove in the market. But When packed it weighs the same as Jetboil MightyMo (due to its hard-shell carry case).

The most important feature of Pocket Rocket 2 is its wind protector design, it has a 3-direction wind clip to offer protection from the wind.

As I’ve mentioned before, it comes with a small rigid plastic case to keep the stove safe, and there is enough room in this plastic shell to store a lighter or a match to start the fire.

It also features a regulator to adjust the heat for simmer control.

Pocket Rocket 2 boils 1 lt of water in roughly 3.5 minutes.

Check the latest price of MSR Rocket Pocket 2.

Features: MightyMo vs Pocket Rocket 2

Fuel Efficiency

Jetboil MightyMo is the clear winner when it comes to fuel efficiency, with 1 oz of fuel it boils 3.4 lt of water, on the other hand, Pocket Rocket 2 can boil only 2 lt of water with the same amount of fuel.

If you are fellow who likes numbers we can also put it this way: Jetboil MightyMo performs %70 better when it comes to fuel consumption.

Weight

For the weight department, MSR Pocket Rocket 2 is the winner.

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 (2.6 oz) weighs 0.7 oz lighter than Jetboil MightyMo (3.3 oz).

Due to Pocket Rocket 2‘s rigid plastic-case for protection, both stoves weigh equally 3.7 oz when packed.

Jetboil MightyMo also features a fuel stabilizer that weighs 1 oz (carrying it is optional).

Packed Dimension

Both Jetboil MightyMo and Pocket Rocket 2 are highly compact, they both pack down to approximately 2″ x3″. So there is nothing to compare compactness-wise. Since we’re talking about the packing down, it’s important to mention, DAMAGE PROTECTION.

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 comes with a rigid carry case which protects the stove from getting harmed, on the other hand, Jetboil MightyMo comes with a cloth-sack which provides no protection at all.

Boiling Time

When it comes to boiling speed, MightyMo is a little bit faster with the ability to boil 1 lt of water in 3 minutes. But Pocket Rocket 2 isn’t bad either, it can boil 1 lt of water in 3.5 half minutes (which is better than most of the backpacking stoves on the market).

Heat Level Adjustability

To be honest, both stoves are great for adjusting the heat from light simmer to a full boil. BUT if I’ve to choose one I would go with the MightyMo, it features a 4 full-turn regulator which gives you very good simmering control.

BUT in windy conditions, MSR Pocket Rocket 2 offers a better simmering control due to its wind clip above the torch.

With that being said let’s dive into the next section.

Wind Protection

Using an ultralight canister stove can be a big burden during high-windy conditions. When the regulator is adjusted to full heat (for boiling water for instance) it shouldn’t cause a problem. BUT adjusting the heat to a light simmer in windy weather might be a pain in the ass.

Due to the reasons above, MSR Pocket Rocket 2 features a wind clip to allow simmering even in windy conditions. But MightyMo doesn’t perform that well in windy conditions.

Ignition

JetBoil MightyMo comes with a push-button fire starter that works down to 20 °F, on the other hand, with MSR Pocket Rocket 2 you need to start the fire with an external ignitor such as a match or a lighter.

Pot Support

You shouldn’t expect great pot stability from a backpacking stove but they both do the job well. Nevertheless, I can say that Pocket Rocket 2 performs better compared to Jetboil MightyMo. Due to its longer pot supports it can hold pots that have a small base diameter as well.

Verdict: Jetboil MightyMo or MSR Pocket Rocket 2

Jetboil MightyMo is the superior one when it comes to:

  • Boil Speed, it boils 1 lt of water roughly 30 seconds faster than Pocket Rocket 2
  • Ignition, it comes with a push-button fire starter, while Pocket Rocket 2 lacks an ignitor
  • Fuel Consumption, it boils 3.4 lt of water with only 1 oz of fuel, therefore, it’s %70 more efficient than Pocket Rocket 2
  • Heat Level Adjustability, although they both offer great simmering control, MightyMo is slightly better
  • Stabilization, it comes with a fuel stabilizer to be steady even on uneven surfaces

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 is the better option for:

  • Weight, when only the stoves compared, it weighs 0.7 oz lighter than MightyMo
  • Durability, it comes with a rigid carry case for extra protection
  • Wind Protection, it features wind clip to allow simmering even in windy conditions
  • Pot Support, it features longer and sturdier pot supports for better pot stabilization

Check out the latest prices of:

Jetboil MightyMo
MSR Pocket Rocket 2



One important note I should mention is, neither of the stoves comes with the canister, you should purchase it separately.

Check out the latest prices of Jetboil Jetpower Fuel and MSR Isopro Canister Fuel.

Filed Under: GEAR Tagged With: comparison, stoves

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2

Footer

Outdooreager.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Copyright © 2023 · eleven40 Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in